|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 36-42
Facial nerve anatomy revisited – A surgeon's perspective
Riju Ramachandran, Anoop Vasudevan Pillai
Department of General Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
|Date of Submission||21-May-2021|
|Date of Decision||22-May-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||22-May-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||23-Jun-2022|
Department of General Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Facial nerve (FN) anatomy is an enigma and its knowledge helps in safe and adequate parotidectomy without compromising the nerve. A review of the literature was done by searching the databases in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the keywords “Parotid,” “FNT,” “Anatomy,” “Surgery,” and “Parotidectomy” and retrieving about 433 manuscripts fulfilling our requirements. FNT anatomy has been described in detail dividing the extracranial FNT under “Exit,” “Trunk,” “Pes Anserinus,” “Divisions,” “Branches,” “Communications,” “Relationships,” and “Termination.” Normal anatomy and variations including classification of the variation have been done. Knowledge of FNT anatomy helps in performing a safe parotidectomy. It is possible to preempt the course of the nerve and dissect the gland in a precise and rapid fashion, especially in surgery for a recurrence.
Keywords: Parotid, facial nerve, anatomy, surgery, parotidectomy
|How to cite this article:|
Ramachandran R, Pillai AV. Facial nerve anatomy revisited – A surgeon's perspective. J Head Neck Physicians Surg 2022;10:36-42
|How to cite this URL:|
Ramachandran R, Pillai AV. Facial nerve anatomy revisited – A surgeon's perspective. J Head Neck Physicians Surg [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 29];10:36-42. Available from: https://www.jhnps.org/text.asp?2022/10/1/36/347987
| Introduction|| |
A surgical endeavor on the parotid salivary gland is very exciting and challenging. A simple surgery becomes so challenging due to the unique arrangement and relation of the facial nerve (FNT) with this gland. It is even the delight of the anatomist to describe the course and relationships of the FNT as it courses from the midbrain to the subcutaneous muscles of the face that it innervates. We have tried to revisit the anatomy of the extracranial course of the FNT, a complex anatomical problem every surgeon has to deal with while performing a superficial or total parotidectomy. Our department is routinely involved in the treatment of patients with diseases of the salivary glands. The unit headed by the primary author has experience performing parotid surgery for about 20 years having done over 200 parotid procedures. The institution also has an exclusive head-and-neck surgery department which is a large volume center for head-and-neck malignancies including parotid. However, data from the head-and-neck surgery department was not included in the review. Data on the patients that underwent parotidectomy are recorded in the hospital information system. Details of the anatomy of the nerve, variations, type of procedure, indication, and such other information are routinely recorded in our hospital database. These were retrieved, reviewed, and detailed notes prepared in the making of this manuscript. Photographs of the anatomy of the FNT and dissection for the parotid surgery are routinely taken and maintained in the department. These pictures were reviewed and a few pictures were included in this manuscript.
The literature review for the article was started in 2018. The first author was invited as faculty for giving a lecture on FNT dissection during parotidectomy at the National Conference of Rural Surgeons of India in October 2018. The initial idea for this document came during the preparation for delivering the lecture. Based on the discussion and inputs from the conference we decided to carry the work forward. Work was discontinued briefly during the lockdown for COVID in 2020. The review was restarted in October 2021. Medical literature was reviewed by accessing the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar using key words “Parotid,”“FNT,” “Anatomy,” “Surgery,” and “Parotidectomy.” Literature available from the early 1900s to the present day was studied and noted. Details were also taken from the standard textbooks on pure and surgical anatomy and major books on surgical procedures.
For the purpose of the review, the FNT was divided into “Exit,” “Trunk,” “Pes Anserinus,” “Divisions,” “Branches,” “Communications,” “relationships,” and “termination.” Literature regarding each of these segments was separately obtained. Around 433 manuscripts and three textbooks were reviewed. Many of these papers presented the general FNT anatomy as a small part of the data. These were omitted. An initial skeleton of the document was prepared. Both authors then separately went through the retrieved literature search to get additional points to enhance the depth of information on FNT. Only documents having specific mention of variations in FNT anatomy, methods to identify the trunk or the nerve monitoring techniques mentioning the anatomy were included in the study. After sifting through the data, 42 papers were included for describing the various parts of the FNT anatomy. Thirteen of these papers had data which had been duplicated in other papers and were further excluded from the study. References of the selected studies were further searched for important relevant studies. Google search engine was also utilized to obtain related studies.
The matter was discussed in the department with surgeons from other units, for additional input and individual experiences of fellow surgeons in the department. This article will describe the extracranial course of the FNT and its anatomical variations which can confuse a surgeon. A knowledge of this variation will help in modifying surgical techniques to overcome the same.
| Intracranial Facial Nerve Anatomy|| |
We shall briefly describe the intracranial course in the following paragraphs before the extracranial course for the sake of anatomical completion.
FNT takes its origin from four nuclei in the lower pons. These are
- Motor nucleus or branchiomotor
- Superior salivatory nucleus or parasympathetic
- Lacrimatory nucleus is also parasympathetic.
- Nucleus of the tractus solitarius which is gustatory and also receives afferent fibers from the glands (sensory).
Together they help give five functions ascribed to the nerve namely.
- Special visceral or branchial efferent – Motor function to muscles responsible for facial expression and for the elevation of the hyoid bone
- General visceral efferent or parasympathetic which is secretomotor to the submandibular, sublingual salivary glands, the lacrimal gland, and glands of the upper aerodigestive tract
- General visceral afferent carrying afferent impulses back from all these glands
- Special visceral afferent fibers carrying taste sensations from the palate and from the anterior two-thirds of the tongue except from vallate papillae through the chorda tympani
- General somatic afferent - Sensory fibers innervating a part of the skin of the ear.
The nerve runs along with the eight cranial nerves and goes forward and laterally to enter the internal auditory meatus. The nerve has two parts at this region a larger motor and a smaller sensory root – also called nervus intermedius. At the meatus, the nerves lie in a grove of the 8th nerve accompanied by labyrinthine vessels. At the bottom of the meatus, the two nerves fuse.
Within the canal, the nerve has three parts defined by two bends – First part runs laterally and bends to run backward in relation to the medial wall of the middle ear. At this point, it is above the promontory. There is an acute bend between the two parts called the genu. It forms the region of the geniculate ganglion of the nerve. There is now a smooth second bend and the nerve continues forward in the third part vertically downward behind the promontory to exit the cranium at the stylomastoid foramen (SMF).
Extracranial facial nerve
The FNT exits the cranium through the SMF and has a short course of about 1 cm outside the parotid before it enters the gland along its posterolateral surface [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]a. Ghosh et al. have described morphological variants of the SMF such as triangular, rectangular, serrated, round, oval, bean-shaped, and irregular. These variants can be potential risk factors causing injury to FNT as it exits the skull base.
|Figure 2: (a) Entry point of facial nerve from stylomastoid foramen. (b) Facial nerve pushed laterally by tumor|
Click here to view
The biggest sigh of relief for the surgeon dissecting a difficult parotid is to see this 1 cm trunk of the FN as it exits the SMF. Identification of this trunk of the FN is a cause for intrigue to surgeons while performing parotidectomy for large tumors. A tumor in the deep lobe may push the nerve laterally making it more superficial and prone to injury at dissection, while a large tumor in the superficial lobe may push the nerve medially and deep and makes identification of the trunk difficult [Figure 2]b. A few useful tips to consider in identifying the trunk are given below.
Approaches to trunk identification in difficult situations.
- The tragal pointer is a triangular extension of cartilage which is seen inferiorly off the tragus, When dissected it suggests the location of the FNT in the direction of its inferoanterior point, usually about a centimeter below and medial to it
- The styloid process can be exposed bluntly from a superior approach, and the nerve is found inferolateral to it
- The tympanomastoid suture (TMS) line can be followed to the SMF. FNT can be identified a few millimeters deep to the outer edge of the TMS which can be felt as a hard ridge under the cartilaginous part of the external auditory meatus
- The posterior belly of the digastric muscle crosses the sternocleidomastoid muscle approximately 1 cm inferior and 1 cm superficial to the location of the nerve. It is highly useful as a marker of the depth of the FNT [Figure 3]a
- Any peripheral branch, including the branch to the digastric muscle, can be followed back to the main trunk, which is then dissected in the usual fashion. This is called the retrograde dissection
- The mastoid can be drilled to allow identification of the FNT in settings of severely abnormal anatomy, complicated revision surgery, or large tumors abutting the SMF
- The use of nerve stimulators has been described since the 70s. It becomes very useful in recurrence and also for inexperienced surgeons
- Photographs of the nerve anatomy taken at first surgery are also useful when planning surgery for recurrent disease. Dense strands of adhesion may sometimes mimic nerves [Table 1].
There is usually a branch from the occipital artery that lies lateral to the FNT near its exit from SMF. This can often be a source of irritation when it bleeds during the dissection before identifying the nerve trunk. Another landmark is the stylomastoid artery, a branch of the posterior auricular artery. Sometimes, it may originate from the occipital artery or the external carotid artery. A large caliber stylomastoid artery can mask the main trunk of the FNT in some cases.,,
Tragal pointer being a mobile, cartilaginous, and blunt with an irregular tip can be confusing at times to describe the anatomical landmark.
A recent paper by Borle et al. has described a triangle in the region of the parotid which enables the identification of the FNT trunk. They outlined the triangle with the help of three constant landmarks which do not get involved due to parotid diseases. The three landmarks that help in the identification of this triangle are the inferior tip of the mastoid process, posterior border of the ramus of the mandible, and the superior border of the posterior belly of the digastric muscle.
Borders of the triangle
- Line drawn along the superior border of the posterior belly of digastric from the tip of mastoid process
- Line drawn along the posterior border of the ramus of the mandible
- Line running anteriorly from the tip of mastoid process and joining the second line [Figure 3]b.
According to Borle et al., the FNT trunk is usually found around 9 mm to 15mm from the angle between line “a” and line “c” with a mean distance of around 12.18 ± 2mm.
The parotid plexus or pes anserinus (“goose's foot”) is the branch point of the extratemporal FNT after it leaves the SMF. This division usually takes place within the parotid gland. Occasionally, it can be outside the gland. The FNT now divided into cervicofacial and temporofacial divisions [Figure 4]. Rarely, the pes anserinus is missing and all branches arise from the main trunk itself.,
Fasciovenous plane of patey
Within the gland, the FNT and its branches and retromandibular vein (RV) lie in one plane. In this plane, the gland can be split sagitally into two parts, superficial and deep parts without injuring the nerve. Rarely, the nerve can sometimes be completely outside the parotid gland. Sometimes, it can lie deep to the RV.
RV lies medial to the FN temporofacial and cervicofacial divisions in 90%. The RV course is medial to the temporofacial and lateral to the cervicofacial divisions in 10% [Figure 5]. The literature describes the classical position of RV to be medial to the temporofacial and cervicofacial divisions of the FN. RV found lateral to FN is the second-most commonly described variation [Table 2]. Based on this relationship of the FN to the RV, Touré et al. proposed a classification which is given in the table below [Table 3].
|Figure 5: Retromandibular vein lateral to the divisions of facial nerve (Type IId)|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Classification of facial nerve in relation to retromandibular vein according to Touré and Vacher|
Click here to view
Other rare variations seen at this point are,,
- Inferior division of FN was deep into the RV
- FN and its branches were found encircled by venous rings
- FN forked between the MV and its divisions.
Since these variations could not be accounted for in the previous classifications, Piagkou et al. in 2013 proposed an updated classification based on the relationship of FN to RV. In this classification, Type I includes the classically described deep position of the RV to FN, Type II includes superficial position of the RV to FN. In Type III, RV forms a venous ring around the FN [Table 4].
|Table 4: Classification of facial nerve in relation to retromandibular vein according to Piagkou et al.|
Click here to view
In rare cases, the FNT and its branches crossover the superficial temporal vein and maxillary vein either in front or behind these veins. This relationship is shown in Type IV. The table shows the classification that has been adapted from a similar illustration by Piagkou et al. [Figure 5] and [Figure 6].
|Figure 6: (a and b) Retromandibular vein medial to upper division of facial nerve (Type IIb) (Right and Left side)|
Click here to view
The classical description of FNT dividing into its five terminal branches happens as a rarity and is seen in only one-third of the patients undergoing parotidectomy. The five branches described are temporal, zygomatic, buccal, marginal mandibular, and cervical.
For a surgical dissection, two nerves are critical
- The zygomatic branches of the FNT (malar branches) run across the zygomatic bone to the lateral angle of the orbit
- The marginal mandibular branch that lies along the body of the mandible (80%) or within 1–2 cm below (20%). The marginal mandibular branch lies deep to the platysma throughout much of its course. It becomes more superficial approximately 2 cm lateral to the corner of the mouth and ends on the undersurface of the muscles
- The temporal branch of the FNT exits the parotid gland and runs within the SMAS over the zygomatic arch into the temple region.
Classification of branching patterns of FNT was first described by Davis et al. into six types, namely Type I – VI [Figure 7] and [Table 5]. Later in 1987, Katz and Catalano came up with a different classification which included nine types, namely Type IA, IB, II, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, IVA, IVB, and V.
|Table 5: The classification based on branching patterns and intercommunications between facial nerve|
Click here to view
Kopuz et al. added three additional dual trunk types, namely Type VA, VB, and VC. The branching pattern of the FNT is variable and has been classified into six types and are.
Interconnections between the zygomatic and buccal branches are noted in over 70% of cases, whereas interconnections between the temporal or marginal mandibular branches to other FNT branches occur in less than 15% of cases. The buccal branch of the FNT has a close relationship with the parotid duct for over 2.5 cm after it emerges from the parotid gland; it normally lies inferior to the duct. This branch is very variable and based on its relationship with the parotid is classified into four types:
- Type I: A single buccal branch of the FNT at the point of emergence from the parotid gland and inferior to the parotid duct
- Type II: A single buccal branch of the FNT at the point of emergence from the parotid gland and superior to the parotid duct
- Type III: Buccal and other branches of the FNT form a plexus
- Type IV: Two branches of the buccal branch; one superior and one inferior to the duct at the point of emergence from the parotid gland.
However, the parotid duct accompanies the upper buccal branch inferiorly in most cases. Once, the nerve exits the gland they become more superficial and innervates the muscles of facial expression. The FNT innervates 14 of the 17 paired muscle groups of the face on their deep side. Buccinator, levator anguli oris and mentalis muscles are innervated on their superficial or lateral edges.
It is seen that the nerve is at a deeper plane at its exit from the SMF and becomes superficial as it comes to the terminal end.
| Conclusion|| |
Identifying and preserving the nerve gives the patient a cosmetic and esthetically pleasing result, but in an inexperienced hand, the surgery may be a cosmetic nightmare for the patient, the rest of their life. Knowledge of FNT anatomy helps in performing a safe parotidectomy. It is possible to preempt the course of the nerve and dissect the gland in a precise and rapid fashion, especially in surgery for a recurrence.
This material has never been published and is not currently under evaluation in any other peer-reviewed publication.
The permission was taken from the institutional ethics committee before starting the project. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Ghosh SK, Narayan RK. Variations in the morphology of stylomastoid foramen: A possible solution to the conundrum of unexplained cases of Bell's palsy. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2021;80:97-105.
Guntinas-Lichius O, Eisele DW. Facial nerve monitoring. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2016;78:46-52.
Upile T, Jerjes W, Nouraei SA, Singh SU, Kafas P, Sandison A, et al.
The stylomastoid artery as an anatomical landmark to the facial nerve during parotid surgery: A clinico-anatomic study. World J Surg Oncol 2009;7:71.
Moreau S, Salame E, Delmas P. Arterial anatomy of the facial nerve at the stylo-mastoid foramen. Morphologie 2001;85:19-22.
Moreau S, Bourdon N, Salame E, Goullet de Rugy M, Babin E, Valdazo A, et al.
Facial nerve: Vascular-related anatomy at the stylomastoid foramen. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:849-52.
Borle RM, Jadhav A, Bhola N, Hingnikar P, Gaikwad P. Borle's triangle: A reliable anatomical landmark for ease of identification of facial nerve trunk during parotidectomy. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2019;9:33-6.
Wong AS, Teh BM, Safdar A. The absent facial nerve pes anserinus: Implications for parotid surgery. ANZ J Surg 2016;86:1067-8.
Gataa IS, Faris BJ. Patterns and surgical significance of facial nerve branching within the parotid gland in 43 cases. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20:161-5.
Rai AR, Rai R, Bhat K, Rai R. Anomalous location of facial nerve deep to parotid gland. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:652-3.
Piagkou M, Tzika M, Paraskevas G, Natsis K. Anatomic variability in the relation between the retromandibular vein and the facial nerve: A case report, literature review and classification. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2013;72:371-5.
Touré G, Vacher C. Relations of the facial nerve with the retromandibular vein: Anatomic study of 132 parotid glands. Surg Radiol Anat 2010;32:957-61.
Dingman RO, Grabb WC. Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve based on the dissection of 100 facial halves. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1962;29:266-72.
Kim DI, Nam SH, Nam YS, Lee KS, Chung RH, Han SH. The marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve in Koreans. Clin Anat 2009;22:207-14.
Mahore D, Mangalgiri AS, Namdev LN, Kapre M. Variations of retromandibular vein and its relation to facial nerve within parotid gland. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;70:395-7.
Astik RB, Dave UH, Gajendra KS. Variant position of the facial nerve in parotid gland. Int J Anat Var 2011;4:3-4.
Babademez MA, Acar B, Gunbey E, Karabulut H, Karasen RM. Anomalous relationship of the retromandibular vein to the facial nerve as a potential risk factor for facial nerve injury during parotidectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:801-2.
Bhattacharyya N, Varvares MA. Anomalous relationship of the facial nerve and the retromandibular vein: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:75-6.
Alzahrani FR, Alqahtani KH. The facial nerve versus the retromandibular vein: A new anatomical relationship. Head Neck Oncol 2012;4:82.
Rodrigues DC, Andreo JC, Menezes DF, Chinellato PT, Rosa-Júnior GM. Anatomy of the facial nerve and its implication in the surgical procedures. Int J Morphol 2009;27:183-6.
Davis RA, Anson BJ, Budinger JM, Kurth LR. Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve and parotid gland based upon a study of 350 cervicofacial halves. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1956;102:385-412.
Katz AD, Catalano P. The clinical significance of the various anastomotic branches of the facial nerve. Report of 100 patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:959-62.
Gosain AK. Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve. Clin Plast Surg 1995;22:241-51.
Pogrel MA, Schmidt B, Ammar A. The relationship of the buccal branch of the facial nerve to the parotid duct. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:71-3.
Saylam C, Ucerler H, Orhan M, Ozek C. Anatomic landmarks of the buccal branches of the facial nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28:462-7.
Rea PM, McGarry G, Shaw-Dunn J. The precision of four commonly used surgical landmarks for locating the facial nerve in anterograde parotidectomy in humans. Ann Anat 2010;192:27-32.
Pather N, Osman M. Landmarks of the facial nerve: Implications for parotidectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28:170-5.
Witt RL, Weinstein GS, Rejto LK. Tympanomastoid suture and digastric muscle in cadaver and live parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 2005;115:574-7.
Saha S, Pal S, Sengupta M, Chowdhury K, Saha VP, Mondal L. Identification of facial nerve during parotidectomy: A combined anatomical & surgical study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;66:63-8.
Ji YD, Donoff RB, Peacock ZS, Carlson ER. Surgical landmarks to locating the main trunk of the facial nerve in parotid surgery: A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:438-43.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]